Empires of the Mind

Posted by Curtis Gale Weeks, 21 Mar 2007

“The empires of the future are the empires of the mind.”

In general, the Winston Churchill quote is auspicious for 5GW dreaming.  Churchill’s words alone would sum up the theory of 5GW that I have presented on D5GW, or at least the major thrust of that theory.  Whether speaking of OODA loops, or of complex abstractions like patriotism or loyalty and fidelity, or of how 5GW might be operationalized or defined, I have tended to put much weight behind the concept that shaping the minds of individuals will play the most significant role in 5GW conflicts.  I base this assumption on many factors, but primarily upon:


I have hit these topics in various ways in various places already.  To sum up:

Increasingly rapid advancement of technology and increasing levels and varieties of interaction in a globalizing world will make vertical establishment of a particular order relatively impossible — relative to the efficacy of similar methods used in the past — and thus chaos which would be resolved into a beneficial and desirable order will necessarily be resolved at the root level, i.e., at the level of the individual.  Guide the most individuals, and you will have the most influence in shaping the system — if, that is, you guide them well.

I don’t intend for that summary to be definitive, but only a limited guide to my thinking!

However, variant concepts for the fifth generation of warfare exist, some perhaps on this blog!  On D5GW, some disagreement appears to occur when discussing the operationalization of 5GW:  I with my head in abstractions continue to deal in broad frameworks and concepts related mostly to human cognition and ideology, and those who want the nuts & bolts consider more fully — or at least, more often — how 5GW might play out in the mundane, mud and blood environment.  Off Dreaming 5GW, concepts for the fifth generation of warfare range further afield:



Others have written of fifth generation warfare on the Blogosphere and elsewhere; this is only a representative list of some of the most divergent conceptualizations that I have read and may be archetypal for understanding the broad-ranging discussion of 5GW.  For instance, the Enigma Foundry took John Robb’s concept and ran with it, while somewhat adding a twist.

I took EF’s consideration of Churchill’s statement, and am now running with it.  The quote I mean.  A search of the quotation via Google will show it has been used quite often  to address issues relating to:  education, biotech, business, politics.  The FBI even includes it in a list of quotations about the future, for its Futures Working Group area of their website exploring the shape of future policing.

All the theories of 5GW I have read, as well as theories relating to technology, education, government, and business, must rely upon one reality:  how people think/believe will influence how they operate in the future.  Divergent theories related to any human enterprise often have different assumptions about how we as individuals and as members of networks or societies view our world, interpret that world, and act in that world in accordance with what we observe and have observed.

If we look at the competing theories of 5GW, we might see which styles of observation still linger in the world.  We might wonder how others, who have never heard of 5GW, will nonetheless be motivated to act in ways addressed by each of the theories of 5GW (or any other theories of warfare.)

If future empires are to manifest, they will manifest when a sufficiently large number of people join an ‘empire of mind.’  A manner of thinking produces a corresponding manner of doing.  If any one ‘5GW’ becomes the reality, it will be because most people involved in conflict buy into that theory — for instance, we might not be far wrong to assume that 4GW exists because a sufficient number of people think and operate in a 4GW manner.  What will move them out of that habit of thought?

Filed in and tagged ,

Leave a comment