Users of
Internet Explorer 6.x
or before should be aware that this site works best in
Firefox (best choice) or
Internet Explorer 7.x.

Some helpful links:

Foxkeh banners for Firefox 2
 
IE 7 at Microsoft

Disclaimers

The views expressed by contributors to Dreaming 5GW are entirely their own and may not reflect the views of other contributors or the general editor.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by
Curtis Gale Weeks
published on
September 14, 2007 6:38 AM.

X + 1
was the previous entry in this blog.

Using OpenID to Comment
is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Site

Powered by Movable Type 4.01

Hosted by LivingDot

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Creative
Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Newt wants his Long War to be a shorter, Big War, but the reality is that the integration processed cannot be magically sped up. Globalization’s spread and impact is way beyond our control at this point in history. We will deal with many small wars that it unleashes, but we can’t bundle them all up into a single notion. We’re no longer in that unitary state world, but a networked one that gets built one node at a time.

Petraeus effort is seminal and does show the way. There’s just no shortcutting history with a rousing call to arms.

In short, we should be exploring what 5GW means, not adding 1GW + 2GW + 3GW = 4GW.


— Thomas P.M. Barnett, September 11, 2007.

So, Tom, explore.  Perhaps it’s time for another personal dream of 5GW…(or at least an update?)

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: TPMB: Against Newt, for 5GW.

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://dreaming5gw.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/195.

5 Comments

Jay[subadei] said:

I wonder if Tom would submit to something of an interview regarding his ideology of 5GW (and the xGW framework?) It’d be fascinating to bounce the ideas put down here off him and get his direct analysis, wouldn’t it?

Jay[subadei] said:

Further rumination: Tom seems to be looking at 5GW as a solution rather than a theory.

Soob,

To me it seems more like he has decided upon a destination and has decided that 5GW may be the best path to follow to reach it. Now he just needs a map.

I think a Q&A might be a good idea. We could solicit question ideas in an open thread. And then submit them out along with as we go followups.

Actually, I like that format for others too: Hammes, Lind, Robb, that New English Review guy…

I suspect 5GW is going to be a non-trivial part of his next book.

Leave a comment