Users of
Internet Explorer 6.x
or before should be aware
that this site works best in
Firefox (best choice) or
Internet Explorer 7.x.
Some helpful links:
![]() |
| IE 7 at Microsoft |
Disclaimers
The views expressed by contributors to Dreaming 5GW are entirely their own and may not reflect the views of other contributors or the general editor.
Site
“Unrestricted Warfare” (URW) and XGW / 4GW / 5GW
Cross-posted from PurpleSlog.
I have been meaning to write this for awhile. Zenpundit’s mention of “Unrestricted Warfare” and 4GW/5GW got me to type it:
I leaning toward the 4GW category being shorthanded as “Full Spectrum Conflict” with the ‘Weaponization of things not thought to be weapons” being key.
Maybe it is best in XGW to treat URW as an additional generation between 4GW and 5GW though.
What do you all think?
The ideas from URW haven’t quite made there way into 4GW/5GW there is a lot of richness in the its ideas. There is more in URW then is in Lind’s 4GW. So, does that make URW a better source for 4GW, or just for how states might fight 4GW? There is a lot of 5GW-ish stuff in there to. Maybe URW concept should be distilled and and treat as a separate category in XGW.
I leaning toward the 4GW category being shorthanded as “Full Spectrum Conflict” with the ‘Weaponization of things not thought to be weapons” being key.
Maybe it is best in XGW to treat URW as an additional generation between 4GW and 5GW though.
What do you all think?
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: "Unrestricted Warfare" (URW) and XGW / 4GW / 5GW.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://dreaming5gw.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/273.




Posted by
3 Comments
I haven’t read the book and so really can’t opine. From both Marks post and the wiki article I suspect the strategies discussed might be varied in terms of xGW though I suspect 1,2 and 3GW are largely cast aside. I’m shooting in the dark and now want the damn book! Is it available via amazon.com?
Just checked and it is. Ordering it shortly.
Here is a PDF to it:
http://www.terrorism.com/documents/TRC-Analysis/unrestricted.pdf
Here is an earlier post of mine —>
http://purpleslog.wordpress.com/2006/04/13/on-unrestricted-warfare-and-the-generations-of-war-framework/
What I got from the book was a broader thinking on the range of methods of conflict, and in the interesting ways that different methods can be combined.
The following methods are listed:
* Atomic warfare
* Diplomatic warfare
* Financial warfare
* Conventional warfare
* Network warfare aka Information Technology Infrastructure warfare (not to be confused with Netwar or Network-Centric warfare)
* Trade warfare
* Bio-chemical warfare
* Intelligence warfare
* Resources warfare aka Natural Resources warfare
* Ecological warfare
* Psychological warfare
* Economic aid warfare
* Space warfare
* Tactical warfare
* Regulatory warfare
* Electronic warfare
* Smuggling warfare
* Sanction warfare
* Guerrilla warfare
* Drug warfare
* Media warfare
* Terrorist warfare
* Virtual warfare (deterrence)
* Ideological warfare
This list should not be thought as of definitive and final.
Offhand it might be useful to add the following to the list:
* Culture warfare
* High Energy warfare
* Infrastructure Systems warfare (e.g. roads , power - think Russia turning off gas pipelines)
* Lawfare aka Legal Systems warfare (was implicitly stated)
* Meme warfare (kind of covered in Ideological warfare)
* Meteorological/Geophysics warfare
* Nanotech warfare (future)
* Netwar
* Network-Centric warfare
* Open Source warfare
* Population / Immigration Warfare
* Reputation warfare
* Robotic warfare
The authors suggest that different methods can be combined in interesting ways.
For instance, the John Robb’s Global Guerrillas idea could be constructed as guerrilla warfare + infrastructure systems warfare + financial warfare + open source warfare.
Many of these conflict types resemble Nye’s Soft Power ideas in that they are non-kinetic and indirect.
The conflict methods cut across the Generations of War categories.
For instance Atomic Warfare:
* 2GW: Strategic Nuclear Weapons
* 3GW: Tactical Nuclear weapons to take out, redirect, and neutralize large Soviet armored formations
* 4GW: The threat of nuclear terrorism and blackmail
* 5GW: Actor A convinces actor B that actor C is planning nuclear terrorist activity against actor B, so actor B needs to take out actor C before actor C has the capability ready; Or actor A does the nuclear terrorist attack but frames actor C for it (same result in both cases)
So I am picturing a conflict matrix:
Left to Right: Hard Power methods / Soft Power methods.
Top to Bottom: 0GW, 1GW, 2GW, 3GW, 4GW, 5GW
One thing that is very noticeable, most of these methods are outside that of what is normally though of as the national security establishment. Also, the time-frames often are longer then that of a two-term president.
Ok, I should write more now, but I have to pack for a trip. Future Purpleslog will followup sometime later.